|
The Ratio four-wheelers
by Mikkel Kjartan

Brake Third to Dia T47 from the Ratio kit 
The Ratio 4-wheelers constitute an excellent
introduction to first-time OO kit-builders. The kits are plastic, quite
accurate and come together easily. Given their prototype history, they
also have a fairly wide scope for application, both in term of period
and use. With the introduction of the Shirescenes
conversion sides, this scope has been extended further.
On the down side, these kits have been around for so long and are so
popular that they do tend towards the kliché. Moreover, one or two of
the kits are based on prototypes that were in fact not as "typical" or
common as some modellers think. However, I find that their excellent potential
as an introduction to kit-building makes up for this.

The Composite to Diagram U4 
The Prototypes
Throughout the late Victorian era, the GWR introduced hundreds of 4-wheel
coaches, consisting of many different diagrams and designs. Many of these
were introduced under Dean, parallel to the development of large fleets
of six-wheelers. The four-wheelers tended to dominate on branches, given
their ability to negotiate tighter curves, but would occasionally appear
in mixed rakes on other lines also.
By the 1920s the four-wheelers were in decline on most parts of the
system, although some branches retained the 4-wheelers into the 1930s.
A limited number of coaches even survived beyond that as Departmental
stock or on workmens trains.

Five-compartment Third to Diagram S9 
Modelling Scope
The models represent the following types:
- Composite to Diagram U4
- All Third to Diagram S9
- Brake Third to Diagram T47
The U4 and S9 were produced in large numbers throughout the 1890s. The U4
uses the S9 underframe and is in fact a little too long, but in a rake of
several coaches this is hardly noticeable. The T47 was a less common vehicle,
having only two compartments as opposed to the more widespread three-compartment
T34. Note also that many four-wheel brakes had the guards lookouts removed,
so the lookouts on the T47 may be incorrect if you are modelling a particular
set on a particular line!

The U4 during construction
One of the most common 4-wheel coach formations on GWR branches was Brake
Third, Composite, Brake Third. This consist was often made up of a T34,
a U4 and another T34, so if you are looking to model this particular combination,
the S9 and T47 are strictly speaking less useful.
That said, there are at least three instances were the Ratio diagrams
ran together: In 1900, sets composed of U4s, S9s, T47s and the full brake
V5s were built to run in local Ruabon-Dolgelly services. And in 1902,
sets composed of the three Ratio diagrams and an E73 composite were built
for local workings in the Bristol area. Finally, the Ratio diagrams seem
also to have been working together on miners trains in South Wales in
the 1940s.
All in all, and with a little modellers license thrown in, the scope
for using the Ratio 4-wheelers includes:
- Branchline trains, in most though not all parts of the system
- Some suburban trains, especially around Bristol
- Some mixed cross-country trains in pre-grouping times
- Workmens and miners trains, especially in Wales in the latter days
of the GWR
- Departmental coaches, often converted
- As grounded coach bodies, if there’s no other excuse!

The S9 underway to completion
The Kits
No need to go into the actual assembly of the kits here, as the Ratio
instructions are fairly easy to understand. They aren’t comprehensive,
but it really isn’t that hard and there is a decent diagram showing chassis
assembly .
A few tips on overcoming three small imperfections in the kits might,
however, be useful:
-
Removing flash
The instructions apologize for the flash found on some of the parts,
apparantly due to worn mouldings. This is especially evident on the
underframe sections and roof. On the underframes, the best approach
is to remove the flash from the back, using a sharp scalpel. In this
way, the risk of loosing detail is much reduced. The roof needs much
care, as it is easy to slice away a strip of the roof itself when
removing the flash too hastily. I try to make one slow, single cut
along the roofline, using a worn blade as this does not ”wander” so
easily.
-
Preparing the stepboards
The stepboards are very fragile, and do tend to break when being prepared.
To avoid this happening, the instructions suggest placing the stepboards
on the edge of a book or suchlike before removing them from the feed
pips. I personally prefer resting them firmly on the cutting map and
applying a light pressure with one hand while cutting with the other.
Once off, the stepboards reveal flash in the indentations made to
clear the axleboxes. This is important to remove properly and entirely,
as the boards will not fit otherwise. Unfortunately, doing this may
cause the stepboards to break again! If this happens, a very thin,
filed-down slice of plastikard beneath the stepboards seems just about
the only way to join them again – glue on its own is not enough.
-
Replacing brake rods and wheels
The rodding between the wheels constitute another fragile area. If
these snap they are very difficult to join, so I tend to simply replace
them with a piece of straight brass wire. This is easy to do and looks
better. I also replace the wheels, as those provided are one-piece
plastic mouldings. Instead I use Gibsons 14mm Mansel wheels with Universal
wheel profile. These are fitted in unflanged pinpoint bearings, (also
from Gibson) located in the frames by enlarging the axlebox-holes
slightly with a small handdrill.
I am currently painting the coaches in a simplified version of the
1900-style livery.
A separate section on this will follow in due course.
|